Intelligence · Roadmap

Assistance that works inside the rules.

Task focused assistants embedded in the applications people use, drafting, summarising and answering from approved sources within the limits you set.

The official's problem

General assistants are helpful, and unaccountable.

The value of assistance is real, but only if it stays inside the boundary and the rules. Officials need help that cannot quietly overstep.

01

Where does it draw from?

From approved sources only, with citations, not the open web.

02

Can it act on its own?

No. Assistants propose; a person approves anything consequential.

03

Is it confined to the task?

Each assistant is scoped to a task and the limits set for it.

Capabilities · Accessible by design

Help where the work happens.

Embedded, scoped assistance, not a general oracle.

In-app assistants

Drafting, summarising and answering inside the tools people use.

Approved sources

Grounded in citable, approved records.

Scoped & bounded

Confined to a task and its limits.

Human decides

Consequential steps wait for a person.

Where it fits

Where AI Assistants fit.

The point of contact between people and governed intelligence.

Governance & compliance

Assistance that respects the boundary.

Assistants draw only on approved sources, stay on approved routes, are scoped to their task, and defer to a person, help you can let into sensitive work.

Customer controlled data boundary Human approval where it matters Reviewable activity record Designed to support AI Act governance Designed to support GDPR obligations

Next step

Embed one assistant, safely.

We put a scoped assistant into one workflow and show it helps without overstepping.